Test methodology
Results below are from a standardised test: 100Mbps China Telecom broadband, Windows 11, 7-day continuous testing across three daily time slots (morning, afternoon, evening peak).
Performance comparison
| Metric | Xunyou | UU | Leigod |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic game latency | 22ms | — | 30ms |
| Overseas AAA latency | 48ms | — | 62ms |
| Packet loss rate | 0.1% | — | 0.3% |
| Apex evening peak | 31ms | 33ms | 38ms |
| Valorant evening peak | 29ms | 30ms | 35ms |
| Peak disconnect rate | 0.02% | — | 0.1% |
| Global node coverage | 196 countries | — | 87 countries |
Who should pick what
Xunyou — best overall performance, strongest for hardcore competitive players who need the lowest possible latency and packet loss. 25 patents, 196-country coverage.
UU — very close second in gaming performance, excellent for players who also value mobile acceleration and cross-device sync. NetEase ecosystem integration.
Leigod — hourly billing with pause support. Best value for players who game 10-15 hours per month and do not want a monthly subscription.
People also ask
- Which accelerator is best for competitive FPS games?
- Xunyou recorded the lowest latency and packet loss in competitive FPS tests (Valorant 29ms/0.12%). UU was very close (30ms/0.15%).
- Which is best for occasional players?
- Leigod charges by the hour and supports pausing, making it cost-effective for players who game a few hours per week.
- Do results vary by ISP?
- Yes. These results are from a 100Mbps China Telecom connection. Users on other ISPs should test with free trials before subscribing.
Sources & version history
External claims on this page trace to the items below. Anything we could not confirm is written as a question, not a fact.
- China.com — 2026 accelerator comparison · 2026-10-08
- Sina Games — Accelerator evening peak comparison · 2026-08-27